Client
CVS Accountable Care
Case study
The work combined a public website with a higher-stakes application flow where the quality of validation and handoff mattered as much as the visible form experience.
Client
CVS Accountable Care
Role
Website delivery and application workflow development
Year
2024–2025
Summary
Helped deliver cvsaco.com and a custom Medicare application workflow with carefully constrained submission, validation, and handoff requirements.
CVS Accountable Care needed a public web presence and a custom workflow through which Medicare participants could submit applications. The visible experience had to remain approachable while the system behind it enforced specific data requirements.
I contributed to both the website and the application integration, with particular attention to the boundary between user-friendly input and dependable downstream data.
Application forms often appear straightforward from the outside. In practice, they sit between people, eligibility or program requirements, internal operations, and other systems that expect data in exact shapes.
This workflow required more than checking whether fields were filled in. It needed deliberate constraints, clear validation behavior, and predictable handling when information was incomplete or could not move forward.
The public case study intentionally stays at that architectural level. It does not expose applicant data, private field definitions, or the rules used to evaluate submissions.
The implementation treated validation as part of the product rather than an error message added at the end.
My contribution emphasized:
The website and application flow were considered together so that the handoff did not feel like a separate or less trustworthy system.
This case study describes work completed for CVS Accountable Care during 2024–2025. CVS later sold its Medicare Shared Savings Program business to Wellvana and exited the ACO REACH pilot. The official March 2025 notice provides the current business context.
This project demonstrates how I approach forms whose consequences extend beyond the browser. The interface, validation contract, recovery path, and downstream handoff all have to be designed as one workflow.
Related writing
Integrations stay safer and cheaper to evolve when teams define field meaning, ownership, and failure behavior before the first sync goes live.
Permission design shapes how safely teams can self-serve, recover, and change a system without constant specialist involvement.
Systems feel reliable when retry, rollback, reprocessing, and operator recovery paths are designed before failure forces them into existence.
Relevant services
Custom app builds and integration work for teams that need systems to talk cleanly across HubSpot, internal tooling, and the rest of the stack.
Builds and refactors for the parts of a platform that determine whether launches stay fast, reliable, and maintainable.